The approach

What is socioanalysis?

Organisations are not only structures, roles and procedures. They are also made of relationships, emotions, histories and experiences—many of which influence how people work without being fully recognised.

Socioanalysis helps people pay attention to this less visible life of organisations and social systems.

It brings together psychoanalytic and systems thinking to explore what may be happening beneath familiar patterns: why a team becomes stuck, why the same difficulties keep returning, why a role becomes impossible to inhabit, or why change produces responses that nobody quite expected.

Rather than assuming that a problem belongs to one person, socioanalysis asks what that experience might tell us about the wider system.

The environment matters too: the spaces in which people work, the institutions and communities around them, and the wider social field. Socioanalysis pays attention to what is visible and can be spoken about, as well as to less visible, unconscious feelings and patterns. Both may shape what becomes possible.

When a task brings anxiety, a group may develop shared ways of protecting itself that also constrain its work. Unconscious phantasies about authority, loss or change may be part of that experience. I treat these as questions for inquiry, not as truths to impose. Explore anxiety, social defences and unconscious phantasy in the glossary ↗

Thinking together

Socioanalysis is not about an expert arriving with the hidden truth about an organisation.

It is a form of inquiry.

I try to meet what I do not yet understand with curiosity and wonder, allowing a question to remain open rather than settling too quickly on an explanation.

I pay attention to experience, relationships, roles, authority and recurring patterns. I become curious about things that do not immediately make sense. From these observations, I develop possible ways of understanding what may be happening and test them against further experience.

Sometimes this allows something that was already sensed to become thinkable. Sometimes it opens a different way of seeing the problem. And sometimes it makes something new possible.

How do I work?

Different situations require different ways of working.

These may include organisational consultation and design, role analysis, individual and group coaching, therapy, Group Relations, Listening Posts, observation, interviews, social dreaming, Future Search, Open Systems Events, social hackathons and experiential work with cultural and team change.

What they share is a willingness to listen carefully to what is happening—not only to what people say should be happening.

The aim is not simply to explain the past. It is to help people and organisations recover their capacity to think, work and imagine what might be possible next.

Intellectual roots

Where my practice comes from

My practice is rooted in the Tavistock tradition: learning from experience, studying groups and organisations as living systems, and attending to what may be happening beneath the surface of work. The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations ↗ and Tavistock Consulting ↗ are two settings in which this tradition has been developed and practised.

Wilfred Bion's study of groups gives me a way to notice the movement between attention to a shared task and unconscious assumptions that may pull a group elsewhere. Eric Miller and A. K. Rice brought a further question into organisational study: how do tasks, relationships and boundaries shape the way work is organised? Their account of organisations as open systems helps me attend to the exchanges between a group and its environment.

Across this tradition, David Armstrong's work has a particular place in the formation of my practice. His writing on the organisation in the mind, the work group and the plurability of experience continues to inform my practice. He described ethical imagination as an active, and resisted, response to dilemmas in organisational and social life: the capacity to find and shape possibilities for working together amid real constraints. This helps me ask what a group might discover about its situation and its own agency.

The name socio-analysis, in the sense used by this contemporary field, is generally credited to Alistair Bain. His 1999 essay On Socio-Analysis brought psychoanalysis, Group Relations, social systems thinking, organisational behaviour and social dreaming together as a field of inquiry and action research.

Susan Long's contribution has been central to the development of socioanalytic practice. Her work on the associative unconscious attends to how meanings and connections emerge within and between social systems. In Socioanalytic Methods, she brought together ways of observing, interviewing and working with dreams, roles and organisational cultures, helping to give the field a rich methodological life.

W. Gordon Lawrence's work on social dreaming and Maurita Harney's work with Long on the associative unconscious are further contributions I draw on. Each opens a different way of paying attention to social life.

Further reading: Armstrong, Organization in the Mind ↗ · Armstrong on ethical imagination ↗ · Bain, On Socio-Analysis (1999) ↗ · Long, ed., Socioanalytic Methods (2013) ↗

How might this help in your setting?

Explore ways to work together